Notes on Human Behaviour and Digital Signage

Metrics are commonly used to assess effectiveness. Playback logs and system metrics provide useful insight.



In practice, human response shapes outcomes. Content can be playing, yet still fail to communicate.



Observing real-world behaviour helps explain why some deployments succeed. Digital signage works best when it aligns with how people behave.



Why numbers alone are not enough


System data confirms that screens are running. It supports maintenance.



What data does not reveal whether information is understood. Schedules can run flawlessly without achieving communication goals.



Focusing only on metrics limits insight. Effective evaluation requires observation.



Observing attention patterns


Viewing is often incidental. Digital signage is usually seen in passing.



Movement patterns influence attention. Displays positioned in shared spaces build familiarity over time.



Because focus is elsewhere, messages must be clear. Behavioural reality favours simplicity.



Context-driven effectiveness


Context influences perception. A display positioned out of view will underperform.



Context also matters. A message suitable for a waiting area may fail elsewhere.



Understanding context improves effectiveness.



Behavioural value of repeated exposure


Familiar messages are noticed more easily. Messages gain meaning over time.



New visuals may stand out briefly. Over time, stable messaging builds trust.



Predictability improves absorption. It updates content without disrupting familiarity.



Behaviour-led signage planning


Human patterns guide design. Understanding how people move shapes better decisions.



When placement matches movement, communication improves without effort.



It aligns technology with reality. Not just for systems.

read more reference

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *